a user's experience on DoubleClink
Doubleclink.com is a new wine diary website from well known New Zealand winery Kim Crawford. You can record what wines you had, and where; and there is a bit of a social networking aspect to it as well. (I’d be more definite about what the site does, but read on and you’ll find out why the site is still a mystery to me.)
And… the first 3000 people to register get sent a free bottle of Kim Crawford wine! So naturally, I had to register.
The first little barrier was an age-verification step before I could even get into Doubleclink: something I’ve not had to do at any other similar website (and I’ve signed up for a lot in the last six months). Not too hard though, and soon I was past the homepage and on to the registration page.
I filled out the registration form, using my main email address (email address #1) wishing the fields could be a little larger, and clicked submit.
And here’s where it started going all wrong. Instead of getting a friendly “You are now registered” message, I got a “Page not found message”. Oh, I thought; don’t know what went wrong there – but I’ll enter my details again in case that works. So I entered my registration details again; and this time when submitting the form got a new error message telling me that I couldn’t use the same email address twice to register. Cool, I thought; my registration must have gone through anyway – I should be able to log in now!
So then I tried logging in. It didn’t work – I got yet another error message telling me to wait for a confirmation message to arrive in my inbox. So I flicked over to my inbox. No email. And no email message five minutes later, none half an hour later; nor an hour later either (and nothing in the spam folder either). I thought this was pretty odd – most websites requiring an email confirmation on signup send you the email immediately. There was a contact email address at the bottom of the homepage – so I sent Doubleclink an email asking them to resend the confirmation email. And in the meantime I tried using the password reset function to see if there was some email problem preventing messages from getting to me. It turned out that I could successfully receive a password reset, but I still couldn’t log into the website.
Well, I got no reply to my email to Doubleclink after a couple days, which I thought was pretty poor form. But I decided to persist and tried registering again using all the same details but using email address #2. Maybe they’d fixed the website and there’s be no “Page Not Found” error.
I was disappointed. I got the same errors all over again.
At this point I was starting to get a bit annoyed. This stuff shouldn’t be hard! So I posted a screenshot of the Page Not Found page to Flickr and sent an message to the @kimcrawfordwine account on Twitter alerting them to the problems I was having.
Again, there was no reply; but over on the Flickr page there were a couple of responses – one from another Twitter user (and long time Flickr member) saying she’d had no problems, and another message from a brand new Flickr member I didn’t know basically telling me the problem was my own fault. The language of the comment read like it was from the website developers, but of course I have no proof of this. I hope it wasn’t!
So then today I had another go at registering, using email address #3, and all the same name and address details as before. But as I was filling in the mobile phone number I had a sudden thought: could my putting the phone number in the very commonly used international format (e.g., +6421000000) be causing the problem? Often, badly written web apps choke on non-ascii characters – and while there are sometimes good security reasons for stopping users from entering these, the web app must always be ready for them to be entered – and have a graceful way of then dealing with it.
So I omitted the + in the mobile number, and sure enough, I got to a very nice “Success” screen (I have since confirmed, by attempting to register yet again, this time with email address #4, that this is in fact the case: adding the + to your mobile number will screw up your registration catastrophically). Not long after, I received a activation email, and within a couple minutes I was into the website and having a quick look around.
Of course, my successful registration was using an email address that I don’t use very often, so the next thing I did was change my email address #3 back to my main email address #1. Unfortunately, this was a very bad move because now Doubleclink is terminally confused. I can’t login using either email address #3 + registered password #3 from my sole successful registration, nor using email address #1 with registered password #3, as one would expect if the email address change had worked correctly.
So now I’m back to square one. Although I have been busy spending quite a bit of time debugging their web app I am still no closer to being able to report back on whether Doubleclink is actually any good at being a wine diary and social network. And at this rate, I never will. Let’s hope Kim Crawford’s very fancy second social networking play, The Artist’s Lounge, works better.
All this was tedious and dry work, and I have worked up a powerful thirst. But not for Kim Crawford wine.

Mr Reasonable
28 November 2009, 17:14 #
I must confess, that my current employer has given me a hard-line appreciation of user experience and testing – wonder who dev’d this site so poorly, so as not to pick-up the numerous user issues and coding pitfalls? Anyone can make a web-site, but it does take skill to make a usable one!
Alan
28 November 2009, 17:39 #
My thoughts exactly. I’m wondering what the standard of the experience inside the site is like now, too.
Julian
29 November 2009, 02:41 #
The big thing for me is the lack of response from them. It matches the lack of care on the user experience. I would be willing to bet the rest of the website reflects this trend and you haven’t missed out on much. I hope they take more care with their wines. I’ll be sticking to my bottles of Vos based on this.
Alan
29 November 2009, 09:36 #
After I had thought about it a bit more, that was what I was thinking too. Everyone screws up from time to time – it’s how you find those problems and deal with them that counts.
Not getting any response from them in the first place was the thing that got me digging more into what was going on.
I’ve since found out that the site is built and run by a local (Wellington) company; while Kim Crawford Wines is based in Auckland and is part of a mega-corporation. Perhaps my email, and any possibility of an interaction with people who could help me, got lost somewhere between those two quite different camps.
The funny thing is that I’ve managed to send a few people to the website to sign up out of this – and they’re liking Doubleclink. So not all is lost.
rowan
29 November 2009, 22:10 #
Hi Alan,
this is one of the marketing team from Kim Crawford here. Sorry about the probs you’ve had with the site – and especially for the lack of response on your enquiry / complaint. We’re about to activate our Doubleclink Twitter account so I’ll get in touch with you here to follow up on the issues you’ve been having (alternatively someone should be in touch through the site enquiry process).
Anyway, apologies again for the probs, and lets hope we can resolve it all quickly and get you on the site (and enjoying a bottle of Kim Crawford!)
cheers
Rowan
Alan
29 November 2009, 22:48 #
Rowan:
Thanks – I look forward to getting all this sorted out. And yes, I admit it – one of those 3000 bottles of wine will be nice too.
john
30 November 2009, 21:23 #
Hi guys, if you love wine be sure to check out lovewine.co.nz for a refreshing experience. :)
Alan
30 November 2009, 21:31 #
I have signed up to lovewine.co.nz. However, I found the site a bit too slow to use and haven’t visited it in a while. I’ll have a look at it again before I write my increasingly large round-up of social wine sites.
Meanwhile, the DoubleClink marketing & technical people have sorted out my login (thanks!), so I’ve been able to get in and have a bit of a look. But as with my thoughts on lovewine.co.nz, more on that, another day.
Lance
12 December 2009, 06:39 #
The Artist Lounge site isn’t much better, when I got there I seem to have been dropped in the middle of a conversation and had no idea what to do